[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150803034642.GV899@linux>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 09:16:42 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
kernel@...inux.com,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@...aro.org>,
Ajit Pal Singh <ajitpal.singh@...com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] dt: power: st: Provide bindings for ST's OPPs
On 31-07-15, 09:37, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> For qcom platforms, the frequency is almost always constant.
> There may be some tables where we have a couple higher
> frequencies than others because the speed bin is different.
> Otherwise the voltage/current is changing based on the silicon
> characteristics. So the biggest duplication is the frequency
> property.
>
> As far as I know there isn't any algorithm to generate the
> voltage values. It's all hand tuned tables based on the silicon
> characterization, so we're left to store these tables in DT and
> pick the right one at runtime. With regards to the table
> explosion, on qcom platforms we haven't worried that we have ~40
> tables, but I'm not opposed to expressing it in a smaller set of
> nodes, tables, etc. if that's what's desired.
>
> Do we need vendor specific properties for that though? Or do we
> need some sort of extended frequency/voltage properties that are
> arrays of values that we can index into based on some silicon
> characteristics? I like the name based approach because it's
> simple. Use this OPP table because it's called
> x-y-z-characteristics and be done. Cramming the tables into less
> lines may save us some typing and dtb space, but I'm not sure
> what else it does.
What about something like this:
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt
index 0cb44dc21f97..bad7a8299b9c 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt
@@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ This describes the OPPs belonging to a device. This node can have following
reference an OPP.
Optional properties:
+- opp-cuts: One or more strings, describing the versions of hardware the OPPs
+ can support.
- opp-shared: Indicates that device nodes using this OPP Table Node's phandle
switch their DVFS state together, i.e. they share clock/voltage/current lines.
Missing property means devices have independent clock/voltage/current lines,
@@ -100,6 +102,9 @@ properties.
Entries for multiple regulators must be present in the same order as
regulators are specified in device's DT node.
+ If used with 'opp-cuts', then the number of entries present here must match
+ the number of strings present in 'opp-cuts'.
+
- opp-microamp: The maximum current drawn by the device in microamperes
considering system specific parameters (such as transients, process, aging,
maximum operating temperature range etc.) as necessary. This may be used to
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists