[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150803175757.2adf3275@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 17:57:57 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...nel.org, jasonbaron0@...il.com, bp@...en8.de,
luto@...capital.net, tglx@...utronix.de, will.deacon@....com,
liuj97@...il.com, rabin@....in, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
ddaney@...iumnetworks.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
michael@...erman.id.au, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 6/8] jump_label: Add a new static_key interface
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 22:00:02 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 03:28:10PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Technically, one can think: "activate the branch", but we are
> > activating not the branch, but the jump label itself.
>
> No you are enabling the branch, you're making the branch body active.
By making the statement "true".
Otherwise we could just have:
static_branch_likely(&blah) {
[..]
}
And remove the "if".
Then it would make sense to enable or disable it.
>
> There is no enable/disable/true/false for the jump label, only NOP or
> JUMP, and either can result in an active branch body.
That's implementation details, not a general concept that users will
need to know about.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists