[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150804074116.GH25159@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 09:41:16 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] sched: Migrate sched to use new tick dependency
mask model
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 07:30:32PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > But you've forgotten about SCHED_DEADLINE, we count those in:
> > rq->dl.dl_nr_running.
>
> Indeed. Hmm, there is no preemption between SCHED_DEALINE tasks, right?
> So I can treat it like SCHED_FIFO.
Sadly no. Even though EDF has static job priority (once a job is
activated its priority doesn't change anymore) DEADLINE also has a CBS
component and that needs the tick regardless, even with a single task.
So any deadline task running means we cannot stop the tick.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists