[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55C076A8.6060206@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 16:24:08 +0800
From: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: <mingo@...hat.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<rjw@...ysocki.net>, <hpa@...or.com>, <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
<yasu.isimatu@...il.com>, <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>, <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>,
<gongzhaogang@...pur.com>, <qiaonuohan@...fujitsu.com>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86, gfp: Cache best near node for memory allocation.
On 08/04/2015 04:05 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
> ......
>
>
> But,
> 1) in cpu_up(), it will try to online a node, and it doesn't check if
> the node has memory.
> 2) in try_offline_node(), it offlines CPUs first, and then the memory.
>
> This behavior looks a little wired, or let's say it is ambiguous. It
> seems that a NUMA node
> consists of CPUs and memory. So if the CPUs are online, the node should
> be online.
> Hi Chen,
> I have posted a patch set to enable memoryless node on x86,
> will repost it for review:) Hope it help to solve this issue.
> Thanks!
> Gerry
>
>
Sure. Looking forward to the latest patches. :)
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists