[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150804083819.2F3EE6C83EF9@dd34104.kasserver.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:38:19 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Timo Sigurdsson" <public_timo.s@...entcreek.de>
To: maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, wens@...e.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sunxi: Raise minimum CPU voltage for sun7i-a20 to a level all boards can supply
Hi Maxime,
Maxime Ripard schrieb am 03.08.2015 11:13:
> On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 09:23:06PM +0200, Timo Sigurdsson wrote:
>> sun7i-a20.dtsi contains an cpufreq operating point at 0.9 volts. Most A20
>> boards
>> (or all?), however, do not allow the voltage to go below 1.0V. Thus, raise the
>> voltage for the lowest operating point to 1.0V so all boards can actually use
>> it.
>
> This is not a property of a board, but is the actual limit documented
> by Allwinner for the A20. Some individual SoCs might have wider
> tolerances, but that's not a property of a board, it's really a
> property of a single SoC, and we cannot make any assumption on the
> board.
Thanks for the clarification. That was a misunderstanding on my side. I can
update the commit message in a second version of the patch, but the actual
code change can be kept as is then, I guess.
> (and please make sure to run checkpatch before sending your patches)
Sorry about that. Will do when I post a second version of the patch.
Thanks,
Timo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists