[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150804084855.GK25159@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:48:55 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, hannes@...xchg.org, lizefan@...wei.com,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] cgroup: define controller file conventions
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 06:41:27PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> This patch defines CGROUP_WEIGHT_MIN/DFL/MAX to be used on all weight
> based control knobs and documents the conventions that controllers
> should follow on the unified hierarchy. Except for io.weight knob,
> all existing unified hierarchy knobs are already compliant. A
> follow-up patch will update io.weight.
> +- If a controller implements ratio based resource distribution, the
> + control knob should be named "weight" and have the range [1, 10000]
> + and 100 should be the default value. The values are chosen to allow
> + enough and symmetric bias in both directions while keeping it
> + intuitive (the default is 100%).
Aside from 100% being a sane 'default', what it actually is is a unit.
100% == 1.
So I would suggest naming the thing CGROUP_WEIGHT_UNIT := 100,
> +/*
> + * All weight knobs on the default hierarhcy should use the following min,
> + * default and max values. The default value is the logarithmic center of
> + * MIN and MAX and allows 100x to be expressed in both directions.
> + */
> +#define CGROUP_WEIGHT_MIN 1
> +#define CGROUP_WEIGHT_DFL 100
> +#define CGROUP_WEIGHT_MAX 10000
That said, I'm not entirely keen on having to change this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists