[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150804092027.GN25159@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:20:27 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] compiler.h: cast away attributes in WRITE_ONCE magic
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 09:55:48AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> kernel build bot showed a warning triggered by commit
> 76695af20c01 ("locking, arch: use WRITE_ONCE()/READ_ONCE() in
> smp_store_release()/smp_load_acquire()"). Turns out that sparse
> does not like WRITE_ONCE accessing elements from the (sparse)
> rcu address space.
>
> fs/afs/inode.c:448:9: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces)
> fs/afs/inode.c:448:9: expected struct afs_permits *__val
> fs/afs/inode.c:448:9: got void [noderef] <asn:4>*<noident>
>
> Solution is to force cast away the sparse attributes for the initializer
> of the union in WRITE_SAME. As this now gets too long, lets split
WRITE_ONCE, right?
> the macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/compiler.h | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
> index e08a6ae..c836eb2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
> @@ -252,7 +252,12 @@ static __always_inline void __write_once_size(volatile void *p, void *res, int s
> ({ union { typeof(x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u; __read_once_size(&(x), __u.__c, sizeof(x)); __u.__val; })
>
> #define WRITE_ONCE(x, val) \
> - ({ union { typeof(x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u = { .__val = (val) }; __write_once_size(&(x), __u.__c, sizeof(x)); __u.__val; })
> +({ \
> + union { typeof(x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u = \
> + { .__val = (__force typeof(x)) (val) }; \
> + __write_once_size(&(x), __u.__c, sizeof(x)); \
> + __u.__val; \
> +})
Thanks!
READ_ONCE() doesn't have a similar problem because it only has the one
input type, which automagically becomes the output type, right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists