linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: add the block to the tail of the list in expand()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 4 Aug 2015 09:13:10 +0800
From:	Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	<alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>, <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: add the block to the tail of the list in expand()

On 2015/8/3 12:10, Dave Hansen wrote:

> On 08/02/2015 07:05 PM, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>>>> Also, this might not do very much good in practice.  If you are
>>>> splitting a high-order page, you are doing the split because the
>>>> lower-order lists are empty.  So won't that list_add() be to an empty
>>
>> I made a mistake, you are right, all the lower-order lists are empty,
>> so it is no sense to add to the tail.
> 
> I actually tested this experimentally and the lists are not always
> empty.  It's probably __rmqueue_smallest() vs. __rmqueue_fallback() logic.
> 
> In any case, you might want to double-check.
> 

Hi Dave,

How did you do the experiment?

Thanks,
Xishi Qiu

> .
> 



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/