[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55C0A8A1.2030706@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 13:57:21 +0200
From: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, josh@...htriplett.org,
jbottomley@...n.com, geert@...ux-m68k.org, pebolle@...cali.nl,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, tiwai@...e.de,
yann.morin.1998@...e.fr, corbet@....net,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, roberto@...osmo.org, zack@...ilon.cc,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: document recursive dependency limitation /
resolution
Dne 29.7.2015 v 22:34 Randy Dunlap napsal(a):
> On 07/29/15 13:09, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
>>
>> Recursive dependency issues with kconfig are unavoidable due to
>> some limitations with kconfig, since these issues are recurring
>> provide a hint to the user how they can resolve these dependency
>> issues and also document why such limitation exists.
Good idea.
>> +Kconfig's limitations can be addressed by implementing a SAT solver for it,
>> +but until then, Kconfig is limitted to require developers to use one of
>
> limited
should I apply the patch with the typo fixed or are you going to send a v2?
Thanks,
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists