[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55C0C6C8.3030403@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 19:36:00 +0530
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
mikey@...ling.org
Subject: Re: powerpc: Add an inline function to update HID0
On Tuesday 04 August 2015 03:38 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-04-08 at 08:30:58 UTC, "Gautham R. Shenoy" wrote:
>> Section 3.7 of Version 1.2 of the Power8 Processor User's Manual
>> prescribes that updates to HID0 be preceded by a SYNC instruction and
>> followed by an ISYNC instruction (Page 91).
>>
>> Create a function name update_hid0() which follows this recipe and
>> invoke it from the static split core path.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 11 +++++++++++
> Why is it in there? It's not KVM related per se.
>
> Where should it go? I think reg.h would be best, ideally near the definition
> for HID0, though that's probably not possible because of ASSEMBLY requirements.
> So at the bottom of reg.h ?
just to understand, Something like this will not do?
#define update_hid0(x) __asm__ __volatile__(
"sync\n"\
"mtspr "
__stringify(SPRN_HID0)", %0\n"\
"isync"::"r"(x));
Maddy
>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
>> index c6ef05b..325f1d6 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
>> @@ -685,4 +685,15 @@ static inline ulong kvmppc_get_ea_indexed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int ra, int rb)
>>
>> extern void xics_wake_cpu(int cpu);
>>
>> +static inline void update_hid0(unsigned long hid0)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * The HID0 update should at the very least be preceded by a
>> + * a SYNC instruction followed by an ISYNC instruction
>> + */
>> + mb();
>> + mtspr(SPRN_HID0, hid0);
>> + isync();
> That's going to turn into three separate inline asm blocks, which is maybe a
> bit unfortunate. Have you checked the generated code is what we want, ie. just
> sync, mtspr, isync ?
>
> cheers
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists