[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4797c80014a85142d0b9f92b634c1d93ae9db1e2.1438699154.git.jslaby@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 16:40:59 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 115/123] 9p: forgetting to cancel request on interrupted zero-copy RPC
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
===============
commit a84b69cb6e0a41e86bc593904faa6def3b957343 upstream.
If we'd already sent a request and decide to abort it, we *must*
issue TFLUSH properly and not just blindly reuse the tag, or
we'll get seriously screwed when response eventually arrives
and we confuse it for response to later request that had reused
the same tag.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
net/9p/client.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/9p/client.c b/net/9p/client.c
index ee8fd6bd4035..ae4778c84559 100644
--- a/net/9p/client.c
+++ b/net/9p/client.c
@@ -839,7 +839,8 @@ static struct p9_req_t *p9_client_zc_rpc(struct p9_client *c, int8_t type,
if (err < 0) {
if (err == -EIO)
c->status = Disconnected;
- goto reterr;
+ if (err != -ERESTARTSYS)
+ goto reterr;
}
if (req->status == REQ_STATUS_ERROR) {
p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "req_status error %d\n", req->t_err);
--
2.5.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists