linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] ecryptfs: Allow only one instance per lower path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55C051CA.60009@nod.at>
Date:	Tue, 4 Aug 2015 07:46:50 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>
Cc:	ecryptfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ecryptfs: Allow only one instance per lower path

Tyler,

Am 04.08.2015 um 01:07 schrieb Tyler Hicks:
>> Okay, then I'd argument to give my patch a try although it is not the solution
>> to the problem I've reported. :-)
>> If you don't mind I'll resend with a proper changelog.
> 
> That patch isn't correct since it assumes that all eCryptfs super blocks
> are equal if the lower paths (and, ultimately, the lower inode) are
> equal. However, the lower path is only one of many properties of an
> eCryptfs superblock. For example, the second mount may have been
> configured to use a different file encryption key.

How would this work if I mount /foo using AES to /mnt_a
and /foo again using 3DES to /mnt_b?
Wouldn't both ecrytpfs instances kill each other's files?

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/