linux-kernel - [PATCH 01/11] ext4: Use ext4_get_block

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1438718285-21168-2-git-send-email-matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>
Date:	Tue,  4 Aug 2015 15:57:55 -0400
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] ext4: Use ext4_get_block_write() for DAX

From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>

DAX relies on the get_block function either zeroing newly allocated blocks
before they're findable by subsequent calls to get_block, or marking newly
allocated blocks as unwritten.  ext4_get_block() cannot create unwritten
extents, but ext4_get_block_write() can.

Reported-by: Andy Rudoff <andy.rudoff@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
---
 fs/ext4/file.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/file.c b/fs/ext4/file.c
index 953d519..ca5302a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/file.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/file.c
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ out:
 static void ext4_end_io_unwritten(struct buffer_head *bh, int uptodate)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = bh->b_assoc_map->host;
-	/* XXX: breaks on 32-bit > 16GB. Is that even supported? */
+	/* XXX: breaks on 32-bit > 16TB. Is that even supported? */
 	loff_t offset = (loff_t)(uintptr_t)bh->b_private << inode->i_blkbits;
 	int err;
 	if (!uptodate)
@@ -207,8 +207,7 @@ static void ext4_end_io_unwritten(struct buffer_head *bh, int uptodate)
 
 static int ext4_dax_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
-	return dax_fault(vma, vmf, ext4_get_block, ext4_end_io_unwritten);
-					/* Is this the right get_block? */
+	return dax_fault(vma, vmf, ext4_get_block_write, ext4_end_io_unwritten);
 }
 
 static int ext4_dax_pmd_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
@@ -220,7 +219,8 @@ static int ext4_dax_pmd_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
 
 static int ext4_dax_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
-	return dax_mkwrite(vma, vmf, ext4_get_block, ext4_end_io_unwritten);
+	return dax_mkwrite(vma, vmf, ext4_get_block_write,
+				ext4_end_io_unwritten);
 }
 
 static const struct vm_operations_struct ext4_dax_vm_ops = {
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/