[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <693647000.2315.1438668078706.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 02:01:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To: David <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel <kernel@...oirfairelinux.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, andrew@...n.ch,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: fix EDSA frame from hwaccel frame
Hi David,
On Aug 4, 2015, at 1:21 AM, David davem@...emloft.net wrote:
> From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
> Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 21:46:02 -0400
>
>> If the underlying network device features NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX,
>> an EDSA frame is prepended with a 802.1q header once queued.
>>
>> To fix this, push the VLAN tag to the payload if present, before
>> checking the frame protocol.
>>
>> [note: we may prefer to access directly VLAN TCI from hwaccel frames,
>> but this approach is simpler.]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
>
> This is a bug fix so should target 'net', but you generated the patch
> against 'net-next'.
>
> In any event, you should be explicit about the tree you are targetting
> in order to not waste my time like this, by simply specifying the
> tree in your "[PATCH xxx]" text in your subject line. Either
> "[PATCH net]" or "[PATCH net-next]".
Dully noted. Should I resend it?
Thanks,
-v
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists