[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150805073117.GP5161@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 09:31:17 +0200
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
nicolas.ferre@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] New Atmel PIO4 pinctrl/gpio driver
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 05:08:07PM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following our discussion, I send an RFC version of my driver. RFC because it is
> not totally achieved, some cleanup and feature addition is needed.
>
> At least, we could discuss about the 'core' part. I have used the pinmux
> property as Mediatek driver. Patch 3 is the internal dt files we are using.
As you can imagine I am fine with the binding, so I can add my acked-by
once you send a non-RFC version.
The only thing I never understood is what's so special about GPIOs that
they have to bypass the pinctrl framework and instead a gpio_request
magically translates a gpio into a pin. Wouldn't it make sense to at
least add the pins in their GPIO mode to
arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2-pinfunc.h?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists