[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150805082721.GY9999@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:27:21 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Pádraig Brady <P@...igBrady.com>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Timo Kokkonen <timo.kokkonen@...code.fi>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] watchdog: Add support for keepalives triggered by
infrastructure
Hello Guenter,
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 12:50:25AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 08/05/2015 12:36 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >the watchdog I'm currently working with on a powerpc platform has a
> >unchangable timeout of ~1 s. To make the machine boot I patched the
> >bootloader and need some automatic pinging in the kernel before
> >userspace takes over.
> >
>
> Does using arch_initcall in the watchdog driver help here, or is that
> still too slow and you really need to hack the kernel ?
I didn't do any measurements yet, but having the bootloader extracting
the kernel, and then send a ping before jumping into it is good enough
even without CONFIG_GPIO_WATCHDOG_ARCH_INITCALL to get the machine up.
(Userspace doesn't do any watchdog handling yet.)
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists