[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwnkHy1gPtRDNQgSBpF=79tfaQibysnrogvE3DF80=ndQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:53:22 +0200
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] x86/vm86: Move vm86 fields out of thread_struct
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Some of these field names are visible to userspace and can't change.
>
> That's a misconception: bits in the uapi headers can be renamed just fine.
I disagree. If it causes pain for user space, we just shouldn't do it.
Some people copy the headers (preferred), others include the kernel
header directory with a include path or a symlink, and it's damn
painful if we start changing things that user space depends on.
I'd say that it's like the ABI - if people don't really notice, you
can do it, but if it breaks the build of a user app, we should be very
very careful. The breakage is often hard to fix because of nasty
versioning issues..
Our goal in life really is "don't screw up user space".
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists