[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150805085957.GA23893@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:59:57 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/entry/64: Refactor IRQ stacks and make then
NMI-safe
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> @@ -280,6 +280,10 @@ __switch_to(struct task_struct *prev_p, struct task_struct *next_p)
> unsigned fsindex, gsindex;
> fpu_switch_t fpu_switch;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY
> + WARN_ON(this_cpu_read(irq_count));
> +#endif
Please introduce a less noisy (to the eyes) version of this, something like:
WARN_ON_DEBUG_ENTRY(this_cpu_read(irq_count));
or so, similar to WARN_ON_FPU().
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists