[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201508051111.21068.marex@denx.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 11:11:20 +0200
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...il.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Han Xu <han.xu@...escale.com>,
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
Huang Shijie <b32955@...escale.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Gabor Juhos <juhosg@...nwrt.org>,
Bean Huo 霍斌斌
<beanhuo@...ron.com>,
MTD Maling List <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hou Zhiqiang <B48286@...escale.com>,
Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] mtd: spi-nor: change return value of read/write
On Wednesday, August 05, 2015 at 10:27:05 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> On 4 August 2015 at 18:42, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 04, 2015 at 08:42:51 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >> On 3 August 2015 at 23:46, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de> wrote:
> >> > On Monday, August 03, 2015 at 08:39:01 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >> >> Change the return value of spi-nor device read and write methods to
> >> >> allow returning amount of data transferred and errors as
> >> >> read(2)/write(2) does.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...il.com>
> >> >> ---
> >> >>
> >> >> include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h | 4 ++--
> >> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h
> >> >> b/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h index e540952..7d782cb 100644
> >> >> --- a/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h
> >> >> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h
> >> >> @@ -185,9 +185,9 @@ struct spi_nor {
> >> >>
> >> >> int (*write_reg)(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 opcode, u8 *buf, int
> >> >> len,
> >> >>
> >> >> int write_enable);
> >> >>
> >> >> - int (*read)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t from,
> >> >> + ssize_t (*read)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t from,
> >> >>
> >> >> size_t len, size_t *retlen, u_char *read_buf);
> >> >>
> >> >> - void (*write)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t to,
> >> >> + ssize_t (*write)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t to,
> >> >>
> >> >> size_t len, size_t *retlen, const u_char
> >> >> *write_buf);
> >> >>
> >> >> int (*erase)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t offs);
> >> >
> >> > You realize that if someone does bisect and has only this patch
> >> > applied, the compiler will complain loudly about mismatching data
> >> > types, right ?
> >> >
> >> > :)
> >>
> >> Yes, the compiler prints a warning. However, only the return value
> >> which is not used changes so it should not cause any real problem.
> >
> > Are you certain that ssize_t is equal to int , always , everywhere ? :-)
>
> No, it's larger or equal.
Not per any standard to my knowledge, but yeah. I don't think it's a good
idea to do this change alone.
> > Note that it is possible to do such conversion even without introducing
> > compiler warnings along the way -- just do the data type conversion first
> > and the other changes in subsequent patches. It will be clear that one
> > patch does one thing then.
>
> If this is the only concern with these patches it is easily amended ;-)
It'd be nice if the others reviewed it as well, additional feedback would be
nice.
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists