[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150805094101.GX25159@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 11:41:01 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Cc: Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu@...wei.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
acme@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, wangnan0@...wei.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pi3orama@....com, hekuang@...wei.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] bpf: Add new bpf map type to store the pointer to
struct perf_event
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:43:35AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> >+static void *perf_event_fd_array_get_ptr(struct bpf_map *map, int fd)
> >+{
> >+ struct perf_event *event;
> >+ struct perf_event_attr *attr;
> >+
> >+ event = perf_event_get(fd);
> >+ if (IS_ERR(event))
> >+ return event;
> >+
> >+ attr = perf_event_attrs(event);
> >+ if (IS_ERR(attr))
> >+ return attr;
> >+
> >+ if (attr->type != PERF_TYPE_RAW &&
> >+ attr->type != PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE) {
> >+ perf_event_release_kernel(event);
> >+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> >+ }
> >+ return event;
> >+}
>
> I'm not sure whether Peter wanted to see the above function to be
> in events/core.c or not.
> imo it's fine here, since perf_event_attr is an uapi struct.
Right, aside from the const issue this is fine, for the exact reason you
state, perf_event_attr is an exposed interface.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists