[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150805114309.GA25784@node.dhcp.inet.fi>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 14:43:09 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] dax: Fix race between simultaneous faults
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 03:58:00PM -0400, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index b94b587..5f46350 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -2426,11 +2426,16 @@ void unmap_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping,
> details.last_index = ULONG_MAX;
>
>
> - /* DAX uses i_mmap_lock to serialise file truncate vs page fault */
> - i_mmap_lock_write(mapping);
> + /*
> + * DAX already holds i_mmap_lock to serialise file truncate vs
> + * page fault and page fault vs page fault.
> + */
> + if (!IS_DAX(mapping->host))
> + i_mmap_lock_write(mapping);
> if (unlikely(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&mapping->i_mmap)))
> unmap_mapping_range_tree(&mapping->i_mmap, &details);
> - i_mmap_unlock_write(mapping);
> + if (!IS_DAX(mapping->host))
> + i_mmap_unlock_write(mapping);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(unmap_mapping_range);
Huh? What protects mapping->i_mmap here? I don't see anything up by stack
taking the lock.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists