[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55C1F919.4080002@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 13:52:57 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: Chen Bough <Haibo.Chen@...escale.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [SHDCI] Heavy (thousands) DMA leaks
On 08/03/2015, 11:39 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 08/03/2015, 11:30 AM, Chen Bough wrote:
>> I carefully review my patch, all the DMA memory mapped in sdhci_pre_req() is unmapped in sdhci_post_req.
>
> I suspect 'host_cookie' or 'next' handling is bad somewhere. But I don't
> know...
>
>> Can you provide the method of your testing DMA leaks?
>
> boot kernel with CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG
> insert the card
> mount it
> rsync from the card ~200 MB
> umount it
> unload the sdhci driver
> the leak warning is reported
>
> I am not sure whether suspend-resume is needed after the first step.
No, it's not. This is sufficient:
boot kernel with CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG
insert the card
<no mounting, partition table read is enough>
remove the card
unload the sdhci driver
the leak warning is reported
>> You said over 4000 leaked mappings during one card transfer, if true,
>> We can't map any dma memory after some sd transfer, do you meet this?
>
> Yes, I see:
> sdhci-pci 0000:02:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 65536 bytes)
> after some time. The driver falls back to non-DMA transfers after that.
> It also generates a warning about that:
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c:857
> sdhci_prepare_data+0x8ec/0x900 [sdhci]()
I am attaching a debug patch and a debug log. You can see where
0x00000000fffb0000 and 0x00000000fffe0000 is leaked. It is when 'invalid
cookie' error happens.
regards,
--
js
suse labs
View attachment "bad_dma" of type "text/plain" (30960 bytes)
Download attachment "debug.patch" of type "application/mbox" (2473 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists