linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] device property: helper macros for property entry creation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1438783338.29746.172.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 05 Aug 2015 17:02:18 +0300
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] device property: helper macros for property entry
 creation

On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 16:39 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> Marcos for easier creation of build-in property entries.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/property.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/property.h b/include/linux/property.h
> index 76ebde9..204d899 100644
> --- a/include/linux/property.h
> +++ b/include/linux/property.h
> @@ -152,6 +152,41 @@ struct property_entry {
>  	} value;
>  };
>  
> +#define PROP_ENTRY_U8(_name_, _val_) { \

PROP_ prefix is too generic.
Maybe DEVPROP_ ? At least for the latter no records in the current
sources.

> +	.name = _name_, \
> +	.type = DEV_PROP_U8, \
> +	.nval = 1, \
> +	.value.u8_data = _val_, \
> +}
> +
> +#define PROP_ENTRY_U16(_name_, _val_) { \
> +	.name = _name_, \
> +	.type = DEV_PROP_U16, \
> +	.nval = 1, \
> +	.value.u16_data = _val_, \
> +}
> +
> +#define PROP_ENTRY_U32(_name_, _val_) { \
> +	.name = _name_, \
> +	.type = DEV_PROP_U32, \
> +	.nval = 1, \
> +	.value.u32_data = _val_, \
> +}
> +
> +#define PROP_ENTRY_U64(_name_, _val_) { \
> +	.name = _name_, \
> +	.type = DEV_PROP_U64, \
> +	.nval = 1, \
> +	.value.u64_data = _val_, \
> +}
> +
> +#define PROP_ENTRY_STRING(_name_, _val_) { \

…_STRING_ARRAY I can notice.

> +	.name = _name_, \
> +	.type = DEV_PROP_STRING, \
> +	.nval = 1, \
> +	.value.str = (const char **)_val_, \
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * struct property_set - Collection of "built-in" device properties.
>   * @fwnode: Handle to be pointed to by the fwnode field of struct 
> device.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/