[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHA+R7OvAjc0VKXR9w7TiRkqs-bU8AMKpoUONsBMWKSvVdEc0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 20:54:59 -0700
From: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To: Nicholas Krause <uboot477@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6:Fix concurrent access issue in the function inet6_rtm_deladdr
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Nicholas Krause <uboot477@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
>
> This fixes the issue with conncurrent access when calling the function
> inte6_addr_del due to this function using non locked wrapper versions
> of certain functions by locking the routing mutex before and after this
> call with rtnl_lock/unlock. After the unlocking just return the error
> code as normal to signal success or failure to the caller of the function
> inet_6_rtm_addr.
>
Huh? Isn't inet6_rtm_deladdr() already called with rtnl lock?
What bug are you trying to fix?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists