linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V9 0/5] map GHES memory region according to EFI memory map

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150805161000.GE4332@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Date:	Wed, 5 Aug 2015 17:10:00 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
To:	"Zhang, Jonathan Zhixiong" <zjzhang@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"tony.luck@...il.com" <tony.luck@...il.com>,
	"ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
	"fu.wei@...aro.org" <fu.wei@...aro.org>,
	"al.stone@...aro.org" <al.stone@...aro.org>,
	"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
	"ying.huang@...el.com" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	"leif.lindholm@...aro.org" <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
	"hanjun.guo@...aro.org" <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
	"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
	"vgandhi@...eaurora.org" <vgandhi@...eaurora.org>,
	"timur@...eaurora.org" <timur@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 0/5] map GHES memory region according to EFI memory map

On Wed, 05 Aug, at 08:58:52AM, Zhang, Jonathan Zhixiong wrote:
> 
> Yes, absolutely. It has been in my mind, sorry I was tied up in the last
> few days. I wonder what I may missed, I certainly do x86 build test with
> versions of the patch set.
> 
> I will try today and report back.

No problem.

I'd suggest moving the implementation into include/acpi/apei.h and
leaving it as static inline instead of implementing it out of line in
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/apei.c.

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/