[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150805162522.GC16341@amd>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 18:25:22 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Cc: Chen Bough <Haibo.Chen@...escale.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] sdhci: fix DMA leaks [was: [SHDCI] Heavy (thousands) DMA
leaks]
On Wed 2015-08-05 17:11:48, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 08/05/2015, 01:52 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >> Yes, I see:
> >> sdhci-pci 0000:02:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 65536 bytes)
> >> after some time. The driver falls back to non-DMA transfers after that.
> >> It also generates a warning about that:
> >> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c:857
> >> sdhci_prepare_data+0x8ec/0x900 [sdhci]()
> >
> > I am attaching a debug patch and a debug log. You can see where
> > 0x00000000fffb0000 and 0x00000000fffe0000 is leaked. It is when 'invalid
> > cookie' error happens.
>
> And you could see the cookie handling is totally bogus.
>
> With this rewrite, I no longer see the problems. Could you confirm it
> still does the good job with respect to performance -- the numbers you
> mentioned in your commit.
>
> Ulf, what do you think about the attached patch? (Do not look at the
> commented info prints.)
Umm. Normally we inline patches for easier comments.
Attaching it with type of _mailbox_ is not really good.
Pavel
[-- Attachment #2: fix.patch --]
[-- Type: application/mbox, Encoding: base64, Size: 8.2K --]
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists