[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55C25701.8030305@hurleysoftware.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 14:33:37 -0400
From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] tty: core: Add tty_debug() for printk(KERN_DEBUG)
messages
On 07/23/2015 09:35 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 10:49:08PM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> Introduce tty_debug() macro to output uniform debug information for
>> tty core debug messages (function name and tty name).
>>
>> Note: printk(KERN_DEBUG) is retained here over pr_debug() since
>> messages can be enabled in non-DEBUG builds.
>
> But pr_debug() is the "standard" way to enable/disable debugging
> messages, so I'd really like to see that be used here.
Ok, I can do that; I'll roll Joe's suggestions in at that time.
> Even better, this is a tty device, so it should be using dev_dbg(),
> which gives us tons of good information built-in for the tty and can
> properly be parsed by userspace tools to know exactly what device caused
> what message at what point in time.
>
> So I'll take this for now, but moving it to use dev_dbg() would be best
> eventually.
The issue with using dev_dbg is that (SysV) ptys are not devices. However,
if you'd prefer, I could rework this macro to format output like dev_dbg;
ie., <driver> <tty name>: <fmt>
Regards,
Peter Hurley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists