[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150805203322.GA39610@dtor-ws>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 13:33:22 -0700
From: "dmitry.torokhov@...il.com" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Philip Moltmann <moltmann@...are.com>
Cc: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"pv-drivers@...are.com" <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
Xavier Deguillard <xdeguillard@...are.com>,
John Savanyo <jsavanyo@...are.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] VMware balloon: Show capabilities of balloon and
resulting capabilities in the debug-fs node.
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 08:22:35PM +0000, Philip Moltmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > MODULE_AUTHOR("VMware, Inc.");
> > > MODULE_DESCRIPTION("VMware Memory Control (Balloon) Driver");
> > > -MODULE_VERSION("1.3.2.0-k");
> > > +MODULE_VERSION("1.3.3.0-k");
> >
> > This constant change of module version is annoying, is it really even
> > needed?
> >
> > I'll take this, but seriously consider just dropping it entirely as
> > it
> > doesn't mean anything now that the driver is in the kernel tree.
>
> I think this is meant so that we can track which patches got backported
> into RHEL and SLES.
That assumes that RHEL and SLES always take everything that is in
mainline, which I would not count. I.e if you have a security fix and
also change version to 1.3.4.0-k and RedHat picks it up is the driver
that they have really 1.3.4.0-k? If not then what?
You really need to keep track of the substance of the changes needing to
go into each distribution.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists