[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1438811379-384-71-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 14:49:02 -0700
From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.19.y-ckt 070/107] bio integrity: do not assume bio_integrity_pool exists if bioset exists
3.19.8-ckt5 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
commit bb8bd38b9a1685334b73e8c62e128cbedb875867 upstream.
bio_integrity_alloc() and bio_integrity_free() assume that if a bio was
allocated from a bioset that that bioset also had its bio_integrity_pool
allocated using bioset_integrity_create(). This is a very bad
assumption given that bioset_create() and bioset_integrity_create() are
completely disjoint. Not all callers of bioset_create() have been
trained to also call bioset_integrity_create() -- and they may not care
to be.
Fix this by falling back to kmalloc'ing 'struct bio_integrity_payload'
rather than force all bioset consumers to (wastefully) preallocate a
bio_integrity_pool that they very likely won't actually need (given the
niche nature of the current block integrity support).
Otherwise, a NULL pointer "Kernel BUG" with a trace like the following
will be observed (as seen on s390x using zfcp storage) because dm-io
doesn't use bioset_integrity_create() when creating its bioset:
[ 791.643338] Call Trace:
[ 791.643339] ([<00000003df98b848>] 0x3df98b848)
[ 791.643341] [<00000000002c5de8>] bio_integrity_alloc+0x48/0xf8
[ 791.643348] [<00000000002c6486>] bio_integrity_prep+0xae/0x2f0
[ 791.643349] [<0000000000371e38>] blk_queue_bio+0x1c8/0x3d8
[ 791.643355] [<000000000036f8d0>] generic_make_request+0xc0/0x100
[ 791.643357] [<000000000036f9b2>] submit_bio+0xa2/0x198
[ 791.643406] [<000003ff801f9774>] dispatch_io+0x15c/0x3b0 [dm_mod]
[ 791.643419] [<000003ff801f9b3e>] dm_io+0x176/0x2f0 [dm_mod]
[ 791.643423] [<000003ff8074b28a>] do_reads+0x13a/0x1a8 [dm_mirror]
[ 791.643425] [<000003ff8074b43a>] do_mirror+0x142/0x298 [dm_mirror]
[ 791.643428] [<0000000000154fca>] process_one_work+0x18a/0x3f8
[ 791.643432] [<000000000015598a>] worker_thread+0x132/0x3b0
[ 791.643435] [<000000000015d49a>] kthread+0xd2/0xd8
[ 791.643438] [<00000000005bc0ca>] kernel_thread_starter+0x6/0xc
[ 791.643446] [<00000000005bc0c4>] kernel_thread_starter+0x0/0xc
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
block/bio-integrity.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/bio-integrity.c b/block/bio-integrity.c
index 5cbd5d9..39ce74d 100644
--- a/block/bio-integrity.c
+++ b/block/bio-integrity.c
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ struct bio_integrity_payload *bio_integrity_alloc(struct bio *bio,
unsigned long idx = BIO_POOL_NONE;
unsigned inline_vecs;
- if (!bs) {
+ if (!bs || !bs->bio_integrity_pool) {
bip = kmalloc(sizeof(struct bio_integrity_payload) +
sizeof(struct bio_vec) * nr_vecs, gfp_mask);
inline_vecs = nr_vecs;
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void bio_integrity_free(struct bio *bio)
kfree(page_address(bip->bip_vec->bv_page) +
bip->bip_vec->bv_offset);
- if (bs) {
+ if (bs && bs->bio_integrity_pool) {
if (bip->bip_slab != BIO_POOL_NONE)
bvec_free(bs->bvec_integrity_pool, bip->bip_vec,
bip->bip_slab);
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists