[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1438811379-384-4-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 14:47:55 -0700
From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.19.y-ckt 003/107] x86/asm/entry/64: Fold the 'test_in_nmi' macro into its only user
3.19.8-ckt5 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
commit 0784b36448a2a85b95b6eb21a69b9045c896c065 upstream.
No code changes.
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427899858-7165-1-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
Acked-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
index 4ee9a23..f02ba29 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
@@ -1438,19 +1438,7 @@ ENTRY(error_exit)
CFI_ENDPROC
END(error_exit)
-/*
- * Test if a given stack is an NMI stack or not.
- */
- .macro test_in_nmi reg stack nmi_ret normal_ret
- cmpq %\reg, \stack
- ja \normal_ret
- subq $EXCEPTION_STKSZ, %\reg
- cmpq %\reg, \stack
- jb \normal_ret
- jmp \nmi_ret
- .endm
-
- /* runs on exception stack */
+/* Runs on exception stack */
ENTRY(nmi)
INTR_FRAME
PARAVIRT_ADJUST_EXCEPTION_FRAME
@@ -1511,8 +1499,18 @@ ENTRY(nmi)
* We check the variable because the first NMI could be in a
* breakpoint routine using a breakpoint stack.
*/
- lea 6*8(%rsp), %rdx
- test_in_nmi rdx, 4*8(%rsp), nested_nmi, first_nmi
+ lea 6*8(%rsp), %rdx
+ /* Compare the NMI stack (rdx) with the stack we came from (4*8(%rsp)) */
+ cmpq %rdx, 4*8(%rsp)
+ /* If the stack pointer is above the NMI stack, this is a normal NMI */
+ ja first_nmi
+ subq $EXCEPTION_STKSZ, %rdx
+ cmpq %rdx, 4*8(%rsp)
+ /* If it is below the NMI stack, it is a normal NMI */
+ jb first_nmi
+ /* Ah, it is within the NMI stack, treat it as nested */
+ jmp nested_nmi
+
CFI_REMEMBER_STATE
nested_nmi:
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists