[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55C34C77.7090303@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 14:00:55 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>, nick <xerofoify@...il.com>,
"christoffer.dall@...aro.org" <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
Cc: "gleb@...nel.org" <gleb@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm:arm:Fix error handling in the function vgic_v3_probe
On 06/08/2015 10:06, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > If this structure of function pointers can handle function pointers with a return type of
> > void I will be glad to do what you request otherwise this would require a major rewrite
> > of kvm arm subsystem for a very simple bug fix.
>
> Just like Paolo said, the error you report should never happen, and
> would be caught by a WARN_ON() the first time anyone boots the kernel.
> Also, failing to register the device ops results in not being able to
> instantiate a VGIC. No harm done. I really don't understand why you want
> to rewrite the probe functions.
I think he just misunderstood my suggestion. I didn't suggest making
the probe functions return void. I suggested that
kvm_register_device_ops return void.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists