Subject: perf: Invert perf_read_group() loops From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Thu Aug 6 13:41:13 CEST 2015 In order to enable the use of perf_event_read(.group = true), we need to invert the sibling-child loop nesting of perf_read_group(). Currently we iterate the child list for each sibling, this precludes using group reads. Flip things around so we iterate each group for each child. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) --- kernel/events/core.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -3809,50 +3809,74 @@ u64 perf_event_read_value(struct perf_ev } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_event_read_value); -static int perf_read_group(struct perf_event *event, - u64 read_format, char __user *buf) +static void __perf_read_group_add(struct perf_event *leader, u64 read_format, u64 *values) { - struct perf_event *leader = event->group_leader, *sub; - struct perf_event_context *ctx = leader->ctx; - int n = 0, size = 0, ret; - u64 count, enabled, running; - u64 values[5]; + struct perf_event *sub; + int n = 1; /* skip @nr */ - lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->mutex); + perf_event_read(leader, true); + + /* + * Since we co-schedule groups, {enabled,running} times of siblings + * will be identical to those of the leader, so we only publish one + * set. + */ + if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_ENABLED) { + values[n++] += leader->total_time_enabled + + atomic64_read(leader->child_total_time_enabled); + } - count = perf_event_read_value(leader, &enabled, &running); + if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_RUNNING) { + values[n++] += leader->total_time_running + + atomic64_read(leader->child_total_time_running); + } - values[n++] = 1 + leader->nr_siblings; - if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_ENABLED) - values[n++] = enabled; - if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_RUNNING) - values[n++] = running; - values[n++] = count; + /* + * Write {count,id} tuples for every sibling. + */ + values[n++] += perf_event_count(leader); if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_ID) values[n++] = primary_event_id(leader); - size = n * sizeof(u64); + list_for_each_entry(sub, &leader->sibling_list, group_entry) { + values[n++] += perf_event_count(sub); + if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_ID) + values[n++] = primary_event_id(sub); + } +} - if (copy_to_user(buf, values, size)) - return -EFAULT; +static int perf_read_group(struct perf_event *event, + u64 read_format, char __user *buf) +{ + struct perf_event *leader = event->group_leader, *child; + struct perf_event_context *ctx = leader->ctx; + int ret = leader->read_size; + u64 *values; - ret = size; + lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->mutex); - list_for_each_entry(sub, &leader->sibling_list, group_entry) { - n = 0; + values = kzalloc(event->read_size); + if (!values) + return -ENOMEM; - values[n++] = perf_event_read_value(sub, &enabled, &running); - if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_ID) - values[n++] = primary_event_id(sub); + values[0] = 1 + leader->nr_siblings; - size = n * sizeof(u64); + /* + * By locking the child_mutex of the leader we effectively + * lock the child list of all siblings.. XXX explain how. + */ + mutex_lock(&leader->child_mutex); - if (copy_to_user(buf + ret, values, size)) { - return -EFAULT; - } + __perf_read_group_add(leader, read_format, values); + list_for_each_entry(child, &leader->child_list, child_list) + __perf_read_group_add(child, read_format, values); - ret += size; - } + mutex_unlock(&leader->child_mutex); + + if (copy_to_user(buf, values, event->read_size)) + ret = -EFAULT; + + kfree(values); return ret; }