[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55C2BC01.3010000@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:44:33 +0800
From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
CC: pi3orama <pi3orama@....com>, He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Xia Kaixu <xiakaixu@...wei.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: perf eBPF patch ordering. was: Re: perf test LLVM was: Re: [GIT
PULL 00/39] perf tools: filtering events using eBPF programs
Hi Arnaldo,
Have you tried 'perf test BPF'? Is that okay on your environment?
Thank you.
On 2015/8/5 0:11, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 12:55:57PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>> Em Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 06:39:39PM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu:
>>> https://github.com/WangNan0/linux.git ebpf
>
>> Ok, but I am checking patch by patch to see if the changes I made are
>> kept, and for the first one, it wasn't (the second one is the cset in
> ouch, you now use a branch named "ebpf" whereas before you used
> "perf/ebpf-for-acme" before, that was what I was looking at now :-\
>
> After I realised that, yes, you kept my changes in the "ebpf" branch,
> looking there now.
>
> - Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists