[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150806160656.GD24385@treble.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 11:06:56 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>, x86@...nel.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/21] Compile-time stack validation
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 10:07:50AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > This is v8 of the compile-time stack validation patch set, based on the
> > tip/master branch.
> >
> > The frame pointer macros are still called FRAME and ENDFRAME because I
> > don't think we converged on anything else yet. Otherwise I tried to
> > address all the other review comments from v7.
>
> So I think:
>
> FRAME_START
> FRAME_END
>
> would be OK.
Thanks, that sounds good to me.
> They could be added as new aliases, keeping the old ones as well, while in the new
> patches you should use this new form.
Turns out nobody uses the existing FRAME/ENDFRAME macros, so I'll just
rename them.
--
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists