| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <55C2CCFA.1030803@infradead.org> Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 19:56:58 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com> CC: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add new description of path-name lookup. On 08/05/15 19:54, NeilBrown wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 20:41:52 -0700 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> > wrote: > >> On 07/24/15 17:28, NeilBrown wrote: >>> >> >> Hi Neil, >> >> Some edits for you to consider. > > Wow, thanks. I think I agree with all ... had to do some research for > "neither is" though. > >> >>> +However, there is a little bit more to seqlocks than that. If >>> +RCU-walk accesses two different fields in a seqlock-protected >>> +structure, or accesses the same field twice, there is no a-priori >> >> no hyphen: ^ > > Do you have an opinion on where I should but "a priori" in italics? > I feel there needs to be something to make it clear the "a" is not an > English "a". I don't think that italics are needed for that. > Jon: do you want an incremental patch, or a resend? -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists