[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55C38B5D.9090407@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 17:29:17 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Wei Huang <wei@...hat.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] ACPI / irqchip: Add self-probe infrastructure
to initialize IRQ controller
On 05/08/15 14:24, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 08/04/2015 08:27 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 29/07/15 11:08, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> This self-probe infrastructure works in the similar way as OF,
>>> but there is some different in the mechanism:
>>>
>>> For DT, the init fn will be called once it finds compatible strings
>>> in DT, but for ACPI, we init irqchips by static tables, and in
>>> static ACPI tables, there are no compatible strings to indicate
>>> irqchips, but thanks to the GIC version presented in ACPI table,
>>> we can call the corresponding GIC drivers matching the GIC version
>>> with this framework.
>>>
>>> This mechanism can also be used for clock declare and may also works
>>> on x86 for some table parsing too.
>>>
>>> This patch is based on Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>'s
>>> work.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-acpi.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 13 +++++++++++++
>>> include/linux/acpi.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>> include/linux/irqchip.h | 13 +++++++++++++
>>> include/linux/mod_devicetable.h | 8 ++++++++
>>> 5 files changed, 83 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-acpi.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-acpi.c
>>> index 6537b43..011468d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-acpi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-acpi.c
>>> @@ -107,3 +107,36 @@ static int __init acpi_gic_version_init(void)
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * This special acpi_table_id is the sentinel at the end of the
>>> + * acpi_table_id[] array of all irqchips. It is automatically placed at
>>> + * the end of the array by the linker, thanks to being part of a
>>> + * special section.
>>> + */
>>> +static const struct acpi_table_id
>>> +irqchip_acpi_match_end __used __section(__irqchip_acpi_table_end);
>>
>> What is this thing for? Nobody refers to it (I know
>> drivers/irqchip/irqchip.c has a similar thing, but that's not enough a
>> reason...).
>
> If I'm not mistaken, this is for proper section termination, please
> see below:
>
> /* scan the irqchip table to match the GIC version and its driver */
> for (id = __irqchip_acpi_table; id->id[0]; id++) {
> ...
> }
>
> Then irqchip_acpi_match_end will be the end of the table section,
> which will terminate the scanning.
Yeah, I got that bit, but I didn't realized this was getting pulled into
the section. It's probably fine then.
>>
>>> +
>>> +extern struct acpi_table_id __irqchip_acpi_table[];
>>> +
>>> +void __init acpi_irqchip_init(void)
>>> +{
>>> + struct acpi_table_id *id;
>>> +
>>> + if (acpi_disabled)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + if (acpi_gic_version_init())
>>> + return;
>>
>> This is the only place where we need the version, right? So just get
>> acpi_gic_version_init to return the version number, and loose the global
>> variable.
>
> The global variable is still needed because we need to get the GIC
> version when scanning the MADT tables, we can't return the table value
> directly in acpi_table_parse_madt() at now.
>
>>
>>> +
>>> + /* scan the irqchip table to match the GIC version and its driver */
>>> + for (id = __irqchip_acpi_table; id->id[0]; id++) {
>>> + if (gic_version == (u8)id->driver_data) {
>>> + acpi_table_parse(id->id,
>>> + (acpi_tbl_table_handler)id->handler);
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + pr_err("No matched driver GIC version %d\n", gic_version);
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
>>> index 8bd374d..625776c 100644
>>> --- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
>>> +++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
>>> @@ -181,6 +181,18 @@
>>> #define CPUIDLE_METHOD_OF_TABLES() OF_TABLE(CONFIG_CPU_IDLE, cpuidle_method)
>>> #define EARLYCON_OF_TABLES() OF_TABLE(CONFIG_SERIAL_EARLYCON, earlycon)
>>>
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>>> +#define ACPI_TABLE(name) \
>>> + . = ALIGN(8); \
>>> + VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__##name##_acpi_table) = .; \
>>> + *(__##name##_acpi_table) \
>>> + *(__##name##_acpi_table_end)
>>> +
>>> +#define IRQCHIP_ACPI_MATCH_TABLE() ACPI_TABLE(irqchip)
>>> +#else
>>> +#define IRQCHIP_ACPI_MATCH_TABLE()
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> #define KERNEL_DTB() \
>>> STRUCT_ALIGN(); \
>>> VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__dtb_start) = .; \
>>> @@ -516,6 +528,7 @@
>>> CPUIDLE_METHOD_OF_TABLES() \
>>> KERNEL_DTB() \
>>> IRQCHIP_OF_MATCH_TABLE() \
>>> + IRQCHIP_ACPI_MATCH_TABLE() \
>>> EARLYCON_TABLE() \
>>> EARLYCON_OF_TABLES()
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
>>> index 0820cb1..04dd0bb 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
>>> @@ -829,4 +829,20 @@ static inline struct acpi_device *acpi_get_next_child(struct device *dev,
>>>
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>>> +#define ACPI_DECLARE(table, name, table_id, data, fn) \
>>> + static const struct acpi_table_id __acpi_table_##name \
>>> + __used __section(__##table##_acpi_table) \
>>> + = { .id = table_id, \
>>> + .handler = (void *)fn, \
>>> + .driver_data = data }
>>> +#else
>>> +#define ACPI_DECLARE(table, name, table_id, data, fn) \
>>> + static const struct acpi_table_id __acpi_table_##name \
>>> + __attribute__((unused)) \
>>> + = { .id = table_id, \
>>> + .handler = (void *)fn, \
>>> + .driver_data = data }
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> #endif /*_LINUX_ACPI_H*/
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip.h b/include/linux/irqchip.h
>>> index 6388873..6b66d3e 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/irqchip.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/irqchip.h
>>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>>> #ifndef _LINUX_IRQCHIP_H
>>> #define _LINUX_IRQCHIP_H
>>>
>>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>>> #include <linux/of.h>
>>>
>>> /*
>>> @@ -25,6 +26,18 @@
>>> */
>>> #define IRQCHIP_DECLARE(name, compat, fn) OF_DECLARE_2(irqchip, name, compat, fn)
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * This macro must be used by the different ARM GIC drivers to declare
>>> + * the association between their version and their initialization function.
>>> + *
>>> + * @name: name that must be unique accross all IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE of the
>>> + * same file.
>>> + * @gic_version: version of GIC
>>> + * @fn: initialization function
>>> + */
>>> +#define IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE(name, gic_version, fn) \
>>> + ACPI_DECLARE(irqchip, name, ACPI_SIG_MADT, gic_version, fn)
>>
>> I don't think this is the right approach. The MADT table has a *huge*
>> number of possible subtables, and none of them is matched by the GIC
>> version.
>>
>> What you *really* want is MADT -> GICD -> GIC type. Your ACPI_DECLARE
>> macro doesn't reflect this at all (you've basically cloned OF, and
>> that's clearly not good enough).
>>
>> This probably require an intermediate matching function, ending up with
>> something like:
>>
>> #define IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE(name, subtable, version, fn) \
>> ACPI_DECLARE(irqchip, name, ACPI_SIG_MADT, match_madt_subtable,\
>> subtable, version, fn)
>>
>> where match_madt_subtable is going to check that a given subtable is
>> really suitable for a given irqchip. None of that should be GIC
>> specific, really.
>
> I'm little confused here, in the previous patch, the gic version is
> stored, so we only need to match the GIC driver with the gic version.
>
> In the GIC dirver itself, we will match the madt subtable to find
> information we need to init the GIC, so I'm not sure why
> match_madt_subtable in the ACPI_DECLARE, I think I missed something,
> please correct me.
What you're missing is that it should be possible to use
IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE with something that is *not* a GIC. It shouldn't be
GIC specific in any way.
You must have a generic way of describing a match in a table by naming
one of its structures, and possibly a type value inside this structures.
I want to be able to write something like:
IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE(ioapic, ACPI_IOAPIC, 0, ioacpi_acpi_probe);
where ACPI_IOAPIC is 1 (the type for the IOAPIC structure in the MADT
table).
For GICv3, I want to be able to write:
IRQCHIP_ACPI_DECLARE(gicv3, ACPI_GICD, ACPI_GICD_GICV3, \
gicv3_acpi_probe);
where ACPI_GICD is 0xC, and ACPI_GICD_GICV3 is 3.
Do you see what I'm aiming for? We follow the spec, strictly the spec,
but all the spec. No shortcut that only ends up matching the GIC in MADT.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists