[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150806163953.GB6907@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:39:53 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>, broonie@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peter.chen@...escale.com,
sojka@...ica.cz, stern@...land.harvard.edu, andreas@...sler.com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
device-mainlining@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb
gadget power negotation
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 11:21:22AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 03:03:47PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > Currently the Linux kernel does not provide any standard integration of this
> > feature that integrates the USB subsystem with the system power regulation
> > provided by PMICs meaning that either vendors must add this in their kernels
> > or USB gadget devices based on Linux (such as mobile phones) may not behave
> > as they should.
> >
> > Providing a standard framework for doing this in the kernel.
>
> it's too late in this cycle to even start discussing this. i'll drop
> from my queue, please resend rebase on v4.3-rc1 once that's out.
Why should that matter? Can't they just rebase on linux-next and we can
work it out from there? the merge cycle is just for us maintainers to
worry about, people can submit code whenever they want to, it's up to us
as to what tree we merge it to (now or next).
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists