[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150806213243.GA16853@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 23:32:43 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/1] perf/x86: Add Intel power cstate PMUs support
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 11:14:17AM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >> +static cpumask_t power_cstate_core_cpu_mask;
> >
> > That one typically does not need a cpumask.
> >
> You need to pick one CPU out of the multi-core. But it is for client parts thus
> there is only one socket. At least this is my understanding.
Oh crud, core as in a group of SMT. There's so much core as in logical
cpu usage around these days I got confused :/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists