[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150806181412.5b474213@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 18:14:12 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, tglx@...utronix.de,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v0 0/3] Simple wait queue support
On Thu, 6 Aug 2015 23:36:49 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 03:31:20PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > 4) poll_wait: currently it and poll_table_entry are both hard coupled
> > > to wait_queue_head_t -- so any users of poll_wait are not eligible
> > > for conversion to simple wait. (I just happened to notice that
> > > recently.) A quick grep shows ~500 poll_wait users.
> >
> > Looks like a good candidate to test the cwait on :-)
>
> Poll uses custom wake functions, which disqualifies them on the spot.
For cwait? That's the complex wait queue (what the current wait queues
will be called in the future).
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists