[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE21AQoATGZQHUUd3=+A1GZ2wt2vgJSmAUO=MQcnUP5cGK9g6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 12:41:51 +1200
From: Charles Manning <cdhmanning@...il.com>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
nsekhar@...com, nm@...com, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] serial: 8250: omap: restore registers on shutdown
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com> wrote:
> I agree; this is what we should do first because someone might want it
> for backports.
Got an idea how far this can be ported back?
I'm being hampered by severe performance issues on a
beagleboneblack-like device (am335x) running on 3.18 kernel.
I have a 1Mbaud link that is getting packets of about 22 bytes @800 Hz
and old omap-serial is keeping up, but killing the CPU.
I'm considering backporting 8250_omap as a get out of jail.
Opinions appreciated.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists