[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55C405E2.3060908@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 10:12:02 +0900
From: taeung <treeze.taeung@...il.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jolsa@...hat.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] perf config: Add a option 'list-all' to perf-config
Hi, Namhyung
On 07/27/2015 05:48 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:58:30AM +0900, Taeung Song wrote:
>> A option 'list-all' is to display both current config variables and
>> all possible config variables with default values.
>> The syntax examples are like below
>>
>> perf config [options]
>>
>> display all perf config with default values.
>> # perf config -a | --list-all
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@...il.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/Documentation/perf-config.txt | 6 ++++
>> tools/perf/builtin-config.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-config.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-config.txt
>> index cd4b1a6..d8b3acc 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-config.txt
>> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-config.txt
>> @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ SYNOPSIS
>> 'perf config' [<file-option>] [section.name[=value] ...]
>> or
>> 'perf config' [<file-option>] -l | --list
>> +or
>> +'perf config' [<file-option>] -a | --list-all
>>
>> DESCRIPTION
>> -----------
>> @@ -31,6 +33,10 @@ OPTIONS
>> For writing and reading options: write to system-wide
>> '$(sysconfdir)/perfconfig' or read it.
>>
>> +-a::
>> +--list-all::
>> + Show current and all possible config variables with default values.
>> +
>> CONFIGURATION FILE
>> ------------------
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-config.c b/tools/perf/builtin-config.c
>> index 6d9f28c..f4a1569 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-config.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-config.c
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ static const char * const config_usage[] = {
>> };
>>
>> #define ACTION_LIST (1<<0)
>> +#define ACTION_LIST_ALL (1<<1)
>>
>> static const struct option config_options[] = {
>> OPT_GROUP("Config file location"),
>> @@ -31,6 +32,8 @@ static const struct option config_options[] = {
>> OPT_GROUP("Action"),
>> OPT_BIT('l', "list", &actions,
>> "show current config variables", ACTION_LIST),
>> + OPT_BIT('a', "list-all", &actions,
>> + "show current and all possible config variables with default values", ACTION_LIST_ALL),
> Why did you use OPT_BIT? Do you want to support multiple 'actions' at
> the same time? I'd rather support just one action, but I won't insist
> it strongly.. Anyway, setting bits will confuse the switch statement
> in the cmd_config().
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
I don't understand why setting bits will confuse the switch statement.
Is the reason about readability of source code ?
But I searched for other parse-option which can be replaced.
Is it better to use OPT_SET_INT instead of OPT_BIT ?
Thanks,
Taeung
>> OPT_END()
>> };
>>
>> @@ -539,6 +542,45 @@ static int collect_current_config(const char *var, const char *value,
>> normalize_value(section_name, name, value));
>> }
>>
>> +static int show_all_config(void)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> + bool has_config;
>> + struct config_section *section_node;
>> + struct config_element *element_node;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; default_configsets[i].section_name != NULL; i++) {
>> + find_config(§ion_node, &element_node,
>> + default_configsets[i].section_name, default_configsets[i].name);
>> +
>> + if (!element_node)
>> + printf("%s.%s=%s\n", default_configsets[i].section_name,
>> + default_configsets[i].name, default_configsets[i].value);
>> + else
>> + printf("%s.%s=%s\n", section_node->name,
>> + element_node->name, element_node->value);
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Print config variables the default configsets haven't */
>> + list_for_each_entry(section_node, §ions, list) {
>> + list_for_each_entry(element_node, §ion_node->element_head, list) {
>> + has_config = false;
>> + for (i = 0; default_configsets[i].section_name != NULL; i++) {
>> + if (!strcmp(default_configsets[i].section_name, section_node->name)
>> + && !strcmp(default_configsets[i].name, element_node->name)) {
>> + has_config = true;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + if (!has_config)
>> + printf("%s.%s=%s\n", section_node->name,
>> + element_node->name, element_node->value);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int perf_configset_with_option(configset_fn_t fn, const char *var, char *value)
>> {
>> char *section_name;
>> @@ -617,6 +659,12 @@ int cmd_config(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
>> else
>> goto out_err;
>> goto out;
>> + case ACTION_LIST_ALL:
>> + if (argc == 0)
>> + ret = show_all_config();
>> + else
>> + goto out_err;
>> + goto out;
>> default:
>> if ((!has_option || use_global_config || use_system_config)
>> && argc == 0) {
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
--
Thanks,
Taeung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists