[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150807074019.GB6935@shlinux1.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 15:40:20 +0800
From: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@...escale.com>
To: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@...escale.com>
CC: <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
<shawnguo@...nel.org>, <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
<linux@....linux.org.uk>, <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
<johan.derycke@...co.com>, <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
<fabio.estevam@...escale.com>, <b29396@...escale.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: add tuning-step seting
support
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 06:38:38PM +0800, Haibo Chen wrote:
> tuning-step is the delay cell steps in tuning procedure. The default value
> of tuning-step is 1. Some boards or cards need another value to pass the
> tuning procedure. For example, imx7d-sdb board need the tuning-step value
> as 2, otherwise it can't pass the tuning procedure.
>
> So this patch add the tuning-step setting in driver, so that user can set
> the tuning-step value in dts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@...escale.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 9 +++++++++
> include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> index 48f009c..803d24f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@
> #define ESDHC_STD_TUNING_EN (1 << 24)
> /* NOTE: the minimum valid tuning start tap for mx6sl is 1 */
> #define ESDHC_TUNING_START_TAP 0x1
> +#define ESDHC_TUNING_STEP_SHIFT 16
>
> /* pinctrl state */
> #define ESDHC_PINCTRL_STATE_100MHZ "state_100mhz"
> @@ -474,6 +475,7 @@ static void esdhc_writew_le(struct sdhci_host *host, u16 val, int reg)
> } else if (imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_STD_TUNING) {
> u32 v = readl(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_ACMD12_ERR);
> u32 m = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
> + u32 tuning_ctrl;
> if (val & SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK) {
> v |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL;
> } else {
> @@ -484,6 +486,11 @@ static void esdhc_writew_le(struct sdhci_host *host, u16 val, int reg)
> if (val & SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING) {
> v |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE;
> m |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL;
> + tuning_ctrl = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNING_CTRL);
> + tuning_ctrl |= ESDHC_STD_TUNING_EN | ESDHC_TUNING_START_TAP;
> + if (imx_data->boarddata.tuning_step)
> + tuning_ctrl |= imx_data->boarddata.tuning_step << ESDHC_TUNING_STEP_SHIFT;
> + writel(tuning_ctrl, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNING_CTRL);
Is there a code indent issue here?
Otherwise, the patch looks good to me.
Regards
Dong Aisheng
> } else {
> v &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE;
> }
> @@ -964,6 +971,8 @@ sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
> if (gpio_is_valid(boarddata->wp_gpio))
> boarddata->wp_type = ESDHC_WP_GPIO;
>
> + of_property_read_u32(np, "fsl,tuning-step", &boarddata->tuning_step);
> +
> if (of_find_property(np, "no-1-8-v", NULL))
> boarddata->support_vsel = false;
> else
> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h b/include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h
> index e1571ef..95ccab3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h
> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/mmc-esdhc-imx.h
> @@ -45,5 +45,6 @@ struct esdhc_platform_data {
> int max_bus_width;
> bool support_vsel;
> unsigned int delay_line;
> + unsigned int tuning_step; /* The delay cell steps in tuning procedure */
> };
> #endif /* __ASM_ARCH_IMX_ESDHC_H */
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists