linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 26/31] net/sched: use kmemdup rather than duplicating its implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 07 Aug 2015 12:35:32 +0200
From:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:	Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/31] net/sched: use kmemdup rather than duplicating
 its implementation

On 08/07/2015 09:59 AM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> The patch was generated using fixed coccinelle semantic patch
> scripts/coccinelle/api/memdup.cocci [1].
>
> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2014320
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>

Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>

Not sure where the rest of this series went, but if you want this patch
to be routed via net-next tree (which I recommend, to avoid cross tree
conflicts), then you would need to send these patches separately, rebased
to that tree, and also mention [PATCH net-next XX/YY] in the subject.
                                       ^^^^^^^^
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/