lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1ZNgmt-000291-Oi@finisterre>
Date:	Fri, 07 Aug 2015 13:30:15 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "regulator: core: Drop regulator_list_mutex when we're done with it on remove" to the regulator tree

The patch

   regulator: core: Drop regulator_list_mutex when we're done with it on remove

has been applied to the regulator tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From 7cd71c3ba166913a0afb8ac0d6bd5d2730fea6df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 13:00:35 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: core: Drop regulator_list_mutex when we're done
 with it on remove

When removing a regulator we hold regulator_list_mutex in order to
ensure the regualtor doesn't become removed again.  However we only need
to protect the list until we remove the regulator from the list so move
the unlock earlier to reduce the locked region.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 68b6165..62e4f3b 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -3827,11 +3827,11 @@ void regulator_unregister(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 	WARN_ON(rdev->open_count);
 	unset_regulator_supplies(rdev);
 	list_del(&rdev->list);
+	mutex_unlock(&regulator_list_mutex);
 	kfree(rdev->constraints);
 	regulator_ena_gpio_free(rdev);
 	of_node_put(rdev->dev.of_node);
 	device_unregister(&rdev->dev);
-	mutex_unlock(&regulator_list_mutex);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regulator_unregister);
 
-- 
2.5.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ