linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: da9063: Add set_voltage_time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 07 Aug 2015 15:21:36 +0200
From:	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	kernel@...gutronix.de, support.opensource@...semi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: da9063: Add set_voltage_time_sel function

Am Freitag, den 07.08.2015, 13:31 +0100 schrieb Mark Brown:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 11:29:23AM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> 
> > Could there any side effects for regulators that currently don't set
> > set_voltage_time_sel at all? How about this:
> 
> That looks reasonable, I can't see why there would be any issue?  Please
> submit this as a normal patch

Thanks, I'll do that then.

>  (or ideally split out the updates to the
> drivers into separate patches).

When splitting the patch, the series either won't be bisectable (core
patch first) or temporarily remove functionality (driver patches first).
What do you suggest?

regards
Philipp

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/