[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6430018.ENq3ajkyRS@sifl>
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 10:30:02 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Cc: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>, linux-audit@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 3/3] audit: add audit by children of executable path
On Friday, August 07, 2015 02:37:15 AM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 15/08/06, Paul Moore wrote:
>
> > I guess what I'm saying is that I'm not currently convinced that
> > there is enough value in this to offset the risk I feel the loop
> > presents. I understand the use cases that you are mentioning, the
> > are the same as the last time we discussed this, but I'm going to
> > need something better than that.
>
> Can you better describe the loop that concerns you? I don't quite see
> it.
It would be the only loop in the patch, look at the for loop in
audit_filter_rules() which iterates up the process' parent chain.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists