[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55C4D9B2.3000708@mleia.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 19:15:46 +0300
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Ian Munsie <imunsie@....ibm.com>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] misc: remove boundary checks from bin attr users
Hi Wolfram,
On 07.08.2015 19:10, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Vladimir,
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:18:22AM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> This change removes a number of redundant checks on bin attribute
>> client's side, the same checks are done by sysfs_kf_bin_read() or
>> sysfs_kf_bin_write() caller from fs/sysfs/file.c.
>>
>> Note, drivers/misc/pch_phub.c and drivers/misc/c2port/core.c may be
>> updated in a similar way, however this task is not done due to more
>> complicated read()/write() callbacks.
>
> Can you resend the patches which touch i2c drivers with me on cc? I'd
> like to take care of them.
if we're talking about this particular series, you should have them in
your mailbox, since you have them applied in wsa/i2c/for-next:
commit d12c0aaf3780c5b26b4ea9e795252381f586c063
Author: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>
Date: Mon Jul 27 00:18:51 2015 +0300
misc: eeprom: at24: clean up at24_bin_write()
The change removes redundant sysfs binary file boundary check, since
this task is already done on caller side in fs/sysfs/file.c
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
commit 1f023297f7f77d434ecc221018d2e181eac0ae36
Author: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>
Date: Mon Jul 27 00:16:31 2015 +0300
i2c: slave eeprom: clean up sysfs bin attribute read()/write()
The change removes redundant sysfs binary file boundary checks,
since this task is already done on caller side in fs/sysfs/file.c
Note, on file size overflow read() now returns 0, and this is a
correct and expected EOF notification according to POSIX.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Do you want me to send them to you again anyway?
--
With best wishes,
Vladimir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists