[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11605783.uxKCOKbq1D@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 00:21:04 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>,
Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@...h.uni-bielefeld.de>,
Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] cpufreq: make scaling_boost_freqs sysfs attr available when boost is enabled
On Friday, August 07, 2015 05:07:39 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 07-08-15, 13:12, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > >From 993ebb6fc632ec7b61654c9610c90ff4dca4be34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> > Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 13:07:51 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq-dt: make scaling_boost_freqs sysfs attr available
> > when boost is enabled
> >
> > Make scaling_boost_freqs sysfs attribute is available when
> > cpufreq-dt driver is used and boost support is enabled.
> >
> > Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@...sung.com>
> > Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
> > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> > Suggested-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
> > index b9259ab..c6a3b98 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
> > @@ -36,6 +36,12 @@ struct private_data {
> > unsigned int voltage_tolerance; /* in percentage */
> > };
> >
> > +static struct freq_attr *cpufreq_dt_attr[] = {
> > + &cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_available_freqs,
> > + NULL, /* Extra space for boost-attr if required */
> > + NULL,
> > +};
> > +
> > static int set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
> > {
> > struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
> > @@ -182,6 +188,8 @@ try_again:
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +static struct cpufreq_driver dt_cpufreq_driver;
> > +
> > static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > {
> > struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
> > @@ -336,6 +344,7 @@ static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > ret = cpufreq_enable_boost_support();
> > if (ret)
> > goto out_free_cpufreq_table;
> > + cpufreq_dt_attr[1] = &cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_boost_freqs;
> > }
> >
> > policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = transition_latency;
> > @@ -411,7 +420,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver dt_cpufreq_driver = {
> > .exit = cpufreq_exit,
> > .ready = cpufreq_ready,
> > .name = "cpufreq-dt",
> > - .attr = cpufreq_generic_attr,
> > + .attr = cpufreq_dt_attr,
> > };
> >
> > static int dt_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > index 95f0186..657542d 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > @@ -609,6 +609,7 @@ struct cpufreq_frequency_table *cpufreq_frequency_get_table(unsigned int cpu);
> >
> > /* the following are really really optional */
> > extern struct freq_attr cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_available_freqs;
> > +extern struct freq_attr cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_boost_freqs;
> > extern struct freq_attr *cpufreq_generic_attr[];
> > int cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table);
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
And what exactly am I supposed to do with this?
Have a robot that will pick up all patches ACKed by you magically or what?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists