[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 19:23:46 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 0/6] Linux 3.14.48-rt49-rc1
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 19:10:17 -0400
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> wrote:
> So we took 20 IRQs in 5s, or 4/s ; not quite the 1/s minimum, but definitely not
> the HZ/s we'd get w/o NOHZ_FULL. Re-running it got consistently 18-20 IRQ / 5s.
OK, so NO_HZ_FULL still isn't great on -rt, but this shows that it
keeps disturbances much lower than without it.
Thanks for the report!
-- Steve
>
> I specifically did NOT unplug and replug cores to "clean" them of tasks; the
> hotplug code just seems to unstable for that from what I've seen in the past,
> and by the looks of the irq counts above, there was no need to either.
>
> The rootfs was basically a ubu 14.10 server install (no X11/gfx) -- not that
> it should matter - so long as other tasks weren't running on the nohz cores.
>
> Paul.
> --
>
> >
> > Enjoy,
> >
> > -- Steve
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists