[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150809063947.GA2436@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 23:39:47 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch -rt 1/2] KVM: use simple waitqueue for vcpu->wq
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 06:45:26PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Its just the swait_wake_all() that is not. The entire purpose of them
> was to have something that allows bounded execution (RT and all).
Still not sure i that might be a too big burden for mainline, but at
least it's not as severe..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists